Talk:Fazal Ahmad Khalid

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Fazal Ahmad Khalid.jpg

Protected
Hello, I have temporarily protected this article due to an edit dispute. Please discuss any proposed edits and let me know when a consensus has been reached. Thanks, Nakon  07:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 31 January 2019
To be fair enough the original contributor of this page should accept the facts and criticism. The following controversy (now removed) describes his controversial role in a specific institution and should not be taken as a biased opinion. If the contributor still disagrees with the statement, this page must be removed permanently. Once the edit will be enabled the controversy section will be added again and should not be removed unless a reasonable justification is given which makes sense!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.4.83 (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * ❌ This page is not currently protected and may be edited directly. — xaosflux  Talk 15:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Controversy
During his tenure as Vice Chancellor UET Lahore from December 2014 to December 2018, he had faced harsh opposition both from faculty and staff because of his incompetency and mismanagement. He failed to recover the deteriorating standard of the university, especially the remote campuses of UET Lahore and did not contribute to improve the overall academics and research at the university. . During his tenure maximum number of faculty left UET Lahore which was an indispensable loss. 58.27.226.232 (talk) 07:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * ❌ sources cited do not support claims made. See WP:BLP. MPS1992 (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * ... with a note that I couldn't have made this edit anyway because the page is fully protected. So this may require wider review. MPS1992 (talk) 08:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

The said controversy isn't related to him and is a generic administration issue well before he was appointed as VC if dates in the referenced articles are considered. The sources do not support the claims made. Shs.phil (talk) 05:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)