Talk:Fearmongering/Archives/2021

Complaint
This article could use some serious work. The way it is now, it only really targets one party in one country. I don't really understand why it's listed in the categories it was, and those it was listed it made it look like (even though the Daisy ad is mentioned) that only the Republican party does this. This presents some pretty big NPOV issues, as well as making it only gives the point from the United States perspective. I think this article needs to either be expanded greatly. --Hawk405359 21:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Funny how you posted that on Remembrance Day, because the exact same problems are still relevant today. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I have expanded the article a lot and removed the 'multiple issues' tag. The mentioning of terrorism may need a little more elaboration. The 'see also' list is a bit long - some of the less important items may be removed. Some of the references to other topics have no separate source here since the sources are in the referenced pages. Is this OK? Agnerf (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Can anyone say "Global Warming"? 69.153.19.102 16:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I attempted to do this by adding, as user above suggested, a reference to the fear-mongering used in the politics of global warming. I also added a reference to product advertising uses that was missing from the original. I'm sure there are many other examples out there besides those that attempt to present political viewpoints. --Smittz (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

(talk) 20:40, April 8, 2015 (UTC) You have a problem with it only dealing with one party in the united states but you have no problem with it being a targeted propaganda term? Wow.

Time to WP:BEBOLD! I'm removing unsourced statements and/or sections. That might reduce this page to a stump page. I'm not against having this page for a good article, but right now it is filled with unsourced non-NPOV and unencyclopedic langnage. Yes, if I goof and remove something that has sources, please restore... with citations to those sources. Cheers! NightMonkey (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

It is focused at united states because simply United States are the country that did the most mongering about it. The one that spent the most fighting it. The one that had the most "impressive" pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joujyuze (talk • contribs) 14:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)