Talk:Feature

It is stated that: "In image processing which can e used for recognition."

I think this definition is to narrow, as it is clearly true that features could also be derived, eg. textural classification. For instance any feature you may derive from a GLCM, is by this definition not a feature.

However I am not sure how this should be properly stated.

-

The defintion provided for software feautre is incorect. it is implied that features are artifical elements used only be 'marketeers'. Features are useful way of describing individual functionality. There is an entire field of feature-based software enginerring with its own academic confererences so the use of the term 'marketeer' is not only perjorative but inaccurate

General sense
Does the word "feature" not have any "general" sense? Is every single meaning attached to a certain context? DanielDemaret 15:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I have been looking for this also and added the wiktionary article but it doesn't explain other uses of the word feature like: "The compositions feature new rhythm structures..." Death2 18:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Gardening
In the UK film The Full Monty and in other UK media, I have seen references to a "feature" in landscaping/garden decor; the impression given by these usages is that it's a sufficiently familiar term that even those who aren't into gardening know it. It would be good if we could find a discussion of that to summarize in either an article or a subsection of a larger article. Lawikitejana 05:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Social science
About features methods — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.213.129 (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)