Talk:FedEx Express/Peer review

Peer review
This peer review evaluated this version of the article.


 * Peer review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) Prose
 * a. well written: b. comprehensive:  c. factually accurate:  d. summary style:
 * lead section paragraphs are small, consider combining (WP:LEAD)
 * wording of largest airline fleet and tonnage in lead section is difficult
 * shifts between verb tenses throughout article
 * single line, single sentence paragraphs throughout article
 * punctuation problems
 * 1) References
 * a. use of inline citations: b. reliable sources:  c. No original research:
 * 1) Style
 * a. lead section: b. appropriate structure:  c. conforms to WP:MOS:
 * left aligned images separate subheading from text (MOS:IMAGES)
 * formatting of citations not according to MOS, use cite template, include title and url and accessed date.
 * 1) Controversy
 * a. neutral point of view: b. stable, with no edit wars:
 * 1) Graphics
 * a. quality: b. image licenses:
 * FedExFeeder image is poor quality and slightly blurry. It is a low resolution image, so the thumb doesn't hide the problems.
 * 1) Quality:
 * Article classification:
 * C-Class. Still needs some work, but hopefully, this will give a better idea than just the B-Class checklist. --Born2flie (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * FedExFeeder image is poor quality and slightly blurry. It is a low resolution image, so the thumb doesn't hide the problems.
 * 1) Quality:
 * Article classification:
 * C-Class. Still needs some work, but hopefully, this will give a better idea than just the B-Class checklist. --Born2flie (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * C-Class. Still needs some work, but hopefully, this will give a better idea than just the B-Class checklist. --Born2flie (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Have edited to (hopefully) improve the quality of prose, and remove most of the grammatical & punctuation errors. Structure may still need attention. --JCG33 (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)