Talk:Federal Communications Commission Open Internet Order (2010)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Quadell (talk) 17:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm afraid this article does not pass our GA requirements. There are several reasons for this. It overuses lists, instead of using prose. It does not offer sufficient background, nor does it link to articles (like Federal Communications Commission) which could provide background. But most importantly, large sections of the prose has been plagiarized from http://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/index.php?blog&action=view&post_id=48

When all these problems have been resolved, I would recommend nominating this article for peer review, and then trying a GA nomination when that process is complete.


 * Can you indicate the exact sections of this article that have been plagiarised? I went to the website mentioned, and I don't see anything that was copied. --John rb11 (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes. Let's discuss it on the article talk page, rather than here. – Quadell (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)