Talk:Federal Data Services Hub

Notability
I added a notability tag because this article appears to lack reliable secondary sources, which, per WP:GNG, are the touchstone of notability. Both the WSJ and the Investors.com sources are unreliable opinion articles. Opinion articles are a particularly poor indicator of notability since they're prone to be used to drum up interest in the authors' pet issues. Using them as the sole support for the creation of an article amounts to advocacy and violates WP:SOAPBOX.

Accordingly, either reliable secondary sources should be added or the article should be deleted. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2013 (UTC)


 * No thanks to the creator of the article, here are some reliable sources:, , , . --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 04:53, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Improvement suggestion
This reads like a press release, my suggestion is to format it more like this article, Combined DNA Index System. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)