Talk:Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120504131207/http://www.bmj.de/EN/FederalOffice/_node.html to http://www.bmj.de/EN/FederalOffice/_node.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416092902/http://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Organisationsplan/Organisationsplan_EN_20150201.pdf?__blob=publicationFile to http://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Organisationsplan/Organisationsplan_EN_20150201.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416093229/http://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Organisationsplan/Infobroschuere_englisch.pdf?__blob=publicationFile to http://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Organisationsplan/Infobroschuere_englisch.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * KAS-Schäffer, Fritz-Bild-395-1 (cropped).jpg

Lottumstrasse controversy
I moved this to the end of the article, because having it in the lede is certainly WP:UNDUE weight to a recent (and small) controversy. But I'm not sure it should be in the article at all. Is it even a controversy? DuckDuckGo-ing "Lottumstrasse" doesn't turn up anything; OTOH, the autocomplete list does suggest "Lottumstrasse 15", which does produce a small number of personal reminisces by one of the plaintiffs arguing that the property should be returned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernanke's Crossbow (talk • contribs) 19:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

"Reich Ministry of Justice" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Reich Ministry of Justice and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 6 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)