Talk:Feedzai

REMOVE CONSIDERATION FOR DELETION/COI TAG
Hello,

I recently made several changes to this page on behalf of my employer, Feedzai. I have recently disclosed this conflict of interest in my profile page. It is my intention to provide fair, neutral tone and point of view to the Feedzai page. I welcome any feedback that will improve the quality of my page while meeting Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. Please advise on how I can improve the page - and more importantly, reduce the risk of page deletion.

Thank you for your time! Ssfdz (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done: This is the wrong way to contest an deletion. Participate in the discussion instead.  ~  Aseleste charge-paritytime 15:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Sources for draft for review
Hello, for the sake of full transparency, I am submitting this draft for review on behalf of my employer, Feedzai, as I have previously disclosed on my User Page. I am including below a list of references that I’ve identified and believe meet the requirements for establishing notability according to WP:NCORP, which was the concern in March during the discussion. New coverage that has been published since the last discussion : Older coverage that I believe was missed during the previous discussion: Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Ssfdz (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * TechCrunch article
 * Público article: Público is a very reputable source and is a major source of media in Portugal
 * O Jornal Económico: Another major source of media in Portugal
 * Another Público article: Note that this one is not about the funding round
 * Observador article
 * Venture Beat article from 2014: This is a very reputable source and talks about the company in detail
 * Forbes (Portugal) article from 2019: This is not a “sites” article and talks about the company in detail
 * Wall Street Journal article from 2015: Wall Street Journal is a very reputable source