Talk:Felipe VI/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 12:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Howdy, thank you for your work on this article and for nominating it! I don't think it's just yet ready for a review though, I'm seeing some large issues:


 * A good bit of unsourced material:
 * "Additionally, he is the third cousin once removed of ..."
 * "Further promotions in 2000 were commandant in the Army ..."
 * The paragraph about his promotion of Spain's economic, commercial, and cultural interests.
 * "and continues to make contributions internationally towards enhancing the importance of voluntary work."
 * "Upon his accession, he became the youngest monarch in Europe ..."
 * "While he is nominally chief executive, he is not politically responsible for exercising his powers. Per the Constitution ..."
 * "a relevant Cuban historian ..."
 * "and from the beginning, the Mexican president showed rejection of what Spain and its companies represented."
 * "After this incident, neither the Royal Family nor the King's Household have spoken about the issue ..."
 * "which had been postponed twice ..."
 * "In the evening, the State Dinner ..."
 * The paragraph beginning with, "On Thursday the 13th ..."
 * "At noon, Oxford University hosted a luncheon in his honour. To conclude"
 * A chunk of the paragraph about the symbology of the coat of arms
 * "These arms differ from those of his father's as king ..."


 * Focus:
 * The first three paragraphs of the "2017 terrorist attacks" subsection are completely unrelated.
 * When compared to other aspects of the topic, I'm not sure if the "State trip to the UK" section has resulted in that much lasting impact to warrant such length.

In termes of minor issues:
 * A fair few short paragraphs and some examples of WP:PROSELINE
 * One or two instances of WP:OVERCITE
 * Some quibbles with formatting, word choice, and grammar, but I intend to look through the article to address these.

Right, this is what I've noticed at a glance. I applaud the sourcing quality though, it looks quite good! I'd consider looking around databases like JSTOR for any books or scholarly articles about him, but perhaps there might not be too much of use. Alright, thanks again for your work, and feel free to ask me any questions! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)