Talk:Felixstowe Porte Baby

Name
The type appears to have been known as the Porte F.B.2 and later acquired the name Porte F.B.2 Baby as far as I can see it was never known as as the Felixstowe Porte Baby at the time. It was a pre-requisite of the Felixstowe family which started with the F.1. Should we rename the article? MilborneOne (talk) 14:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I think CommonName might be appropriate even if contemporaneously it was known as something else. What do the modern sources call it - as the article title, just 'Porte Baby', something else entirely? GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Porte Baby appears to be the common name at the time. Modern sources may just copy Wikipedia! MilborneOne (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * (ec) Peter London's British Flying Boats (2003) calls it the Porte Baby, sometimes with 'Baby' in quotes. Thetford's British Naval Aircraft since 1912 (1978) calls it the Porte Baby. Jack Bruce's article in Flight (1954) generally calls it the Porte Baby, although noting that it was officially designated F.B.2.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Felixstowe Porte Baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150813053311/http://crashsiteorkney.com/page36.htm to http://www.crashsiteorkney.com/page36.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)