Talk:Female perversion

There is no cited mention of opposing ideas or responses to this paper these are needed for balance --Nate 11:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The article was written by a single individual, relying on a single source that is not recognized as a standard reference in the literature. In addition, the supporting sources would appear, at quick glance to be POV and agenda driven themselves.  DashaKat 12:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * just to clarify I agree with the tag & was adding part of the reason --Nate 13:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Now, I understand. Good faith.  So, let's get to work!  DashaKat 16:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)