Talk:Feminism in Chile

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olo 07, Smhidal1, Chantellerodis, Asanyal4. Peer reviewers: Thomasonmariah, Jlombera, Tdasgupt, Abigail Payne.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ariabd. Peer reviewers: Zooshoe.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? There are some facts that flow well with the article. However, they do seem like they are missing appropriate and reliable references.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article that I read was relevant to the article topic. The only information that distracted me was how quickly the prominence of the feminist leaders was explained. I think that needs some more work and research.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is mostly neutral overall. There really isn't any bias within the article. The information is quite straightforward.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? I do think that there are some people in the history of Chile's feminism that are not explained fully. For example, Amanda Labarca's role in the feminism of Chile is special and requires more information. In the article, her history was quite brief. Labarca was one of the leading individuals of the feminist movement in Chile, and the article failed to provide more on that information. Smhidal1 (talk) 05:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
Overall, there were some good points and additions that will improve the article greatly. There are some critiques that I have for each of the sections. For the Early History section, I think it added some good facts I would just be careful of the way you word some things as many of your statements were not entirely fact based. For instance, using phrases such as talking about the positivity she brought into the community or that things were influenced largely because. For the section Leaders of the Feminist Movement I thought there were good facts within the paragraphs but re-read the section as some sentences do not flow together and the beginning first sentences are very confusing as there is not a lot of information about what you are talking about. The most improvements need to be done in the paragraph structure as well as some more facts/resources would be helpful. For the History section I would include a lot more information. It is very vaugue and does not make sense about how these organizations apply to Feminism in Chile or how they came be started. It needs a lot more information to help the article along. For the section, Chile's Structure of Feminism, I almost feel as though this section should be the History section since there were a lot of facts and good information that is lacking for the article. I think it was a good section that had all the information well presented. Some overall points I would make sure the double check your sources and make sure they are up to date as well as check for those "typical" persuasion writing tactics that I found within all of your sections. Overall, great work and I look forward to reading your final product!Thomasonmariah (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

I think this article was constructed very well. The chronological order of the information read very well. Breaking the article up with different sections could provide a clearer view of the main topics within the article, and make it easier for someone looking up particular information to find it easier. I also think going into a little bit more depth with each era and "wave" of feminism could add a lot of value to the article. This is especially true when looking at the final paragraph, which talks about feminism in Chile today. Not only could you talk about the presence of modern day feminism, but you could touch on what people are pushing for in the future. Lastly, adding more sources and citations could make a lot of the points in this article more solid and less biases. I do see that you have four different sources, which is awesome. But finding a few more sources could make adding some more depth and validity to your article very easy. Overall, very good post and very well written. (Abigail Payne (talk) 01:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC))

Evaluating Feminism in Chile Article
While this article has very important aspects of feminism in Chile, it also has quite a few issues. Upon first glance, the structure does not seem sufficient. For example, it is confusing how the history sections are separated into Early history and History - maybe the article would flow better if there were, for example, "Early History" and then "History Continued" or "Later History" as sections? There is also a discussion of the validity of sources used in this article's talk page. Instead of fixing these issues, however, it seems as though most editors have simply flagged the problem sentences such as the sentence "Chile has been known as one of the most socially conservative countries in Latin America" and an editor flagged it by saying, "by whom"? Another issue that I found was in the first sentence - "Feminism in Chile has its own liberation language and activist strategies for rights". While this is a provoking first sentence, the next sentences do not provide what actually IS Chile's liberation "language" and activist strategies. This makes the reader a bit confused on what the article is actually pursuing. It has also been mentioned in the talk page that the Chile's Structure of Feminism article should be merged with this one. I would agree with that and could work to merge these two - it does not make sense to have two different articles that both talk about Chile's feminism. Another unfortunate issue I encountered while evaluating this article was blatant plagiarism. Out of curiosity, I clicked on one citation and found that the exact sentence found in the article under the History section, "When Sarmiento as an exile was living in Santiago, he recommended the liberal treatment of women and their entrance to the University", was front and center on the cited article. Also, in the Leaders of the Feminist Movement section, this article fails to mention Julieta Kirkwood who, in the first sentence of her own Wikipedia article, is described as "one of the founders and impellers of the Chilean feminist movement in the 1980s). Ariabd (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Chilean Women's Day Poster.jpg

Wiki Education assignment: Sex, Gender, and Culture
— Assignment last updated by Illuminaty555 (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: University Writing 1020 Communicating Feminism TR 10 am
— Assignment last updated by Emanuelafabbri (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)