Talk:Feminist Press

Fair use rationale for Image:Fplogo.JPG
Image:Fplogo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

NPOV?
Several chunks of the "Today" section read like a press release and come across as unsourced POV. For instance: "The Feminist Press remains rooted in the symbiotic relationship between a publication and its readership. In this exchange, a book not only promotes ideas to its reader, but it also inspires new formulations that could ultimately shape future publications." "The Feminist Press has remained current and relevant within the fast-changing world of modern politics and the rapid evolution of Feminism. " "While increased involvement within the feminist movement has led to many shifts within the Press’s original mission, its commitment to social justice and freedom of expression has remained fundamentally unaltered throughout its forty-year history." IMO this section needs a re-write to adhere to encyclopedic standards.JamesG5 (talk) 02:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Our intent is to broaden the article with additional annotated information about the years 1973 through 1985, including important publications. This supplementary information is provided by several women who were Feminist Press staff members during those years. RaniceCrosby (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)