Talk:Feologild/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 14:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. It's a short article (would probably be one of the shortest GAs, so I'm going to review it immediately. Ganesha811 (talk) 14:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

interesting short article! We can definitely get this to GA - just one major issue and one minor one (images). Ganesha811 (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll try to get to this tomorrow - today is hubby's day off from work so involved editing isn't happening. Thanks for the review! Ealdgyth (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries! Ganesha811 (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * how does that work for you? Ealdgyth (talk) 16:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * the expansion looks good! I've made prose edits and passed on prose. Any thoughts on the images I mentioned? That's the last thing left. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I added the list picture. Also added a bit about the Anglican Church considering him an archbishop - since the church isn't just redirecting their "official" list of archbishops to the list on wikipedia any more... How's that look to you? Ealdgyth (talk) 16:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * That looks like everything! This article passes GA. Congrats to you and anyone else who worked on it. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)