Talk:FepA

Too technical
I tagged this article mostly because it is too technical for the literate reader who has no knowledge within this field WP:NOT. There is no way for me to vouch for the accuracy of the article. Also I have asked that this be checked for copyright violations. The vocabulary looks like it was taken from some acacemic journal article. Steve Quinn (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply
I think this article is not too technical, but I agree that the introduction needs to be clarified. Which I will do so soon. Facts from papers were used but the overall structure of the article and the words were original. (There are only so many ways you can say "724-residue 22-stranded β-barrel") Kinkreet (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2012 (GMT)

Reply 2
This topic is pretty specialized, when I read a lot of the physic topic Wikipedia, I don't understand. It must be assumed that readers of this article has some basic knowledge of Molecular Cell Biology. This is not a medical article. Kinkreet (talk) 15:27, 15 February 2012 (GMT)