Talk:Ferdinand Nahimana

Doubts on Neutrality
The first four paragraphs of the "Trial and sentence" section and the entire "Falsely accused?" section contain no references and are poorly written. They contain commentary and are not written in a neutral way. The page seems to have been in this shape since 2007. Your thoughts? PZAJ (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I Concur. The "Trial and Sentence Part" also seems to have been pulled directly from a news article of some kind, perhaps translated? 96.49.203.17 (talk) 19:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

This article has been in heavily biased state since 2007 so I am going to rewrite/remove large parts of it in accordance with WP:NPOV and WP:BLP MarkiPoli (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferdinand Nahimana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930210123/http://www.rsf.org/print.php3?id_article=8709 to http://www.rsf.org/print.php3?id_article=8709

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ferdinand Nahimana 2003.png