Talk:Fermium/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'll make some straightforward copyedits as I go - please revert any changes I inadvertently make. I'll jot notes below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * ...with A = 242–260. - I'd write this out as prose, hence "with atomic weights of 242 to 260"


 * ditto 'h' to hours (you have 'days' already just before)


 * link nuclide


 * you've used both actinide and actinoid in the same article. Any reason or can they be streamlined?


 * any potential uses of it?


 * I'd mention in the lead that it can only be produced in minute quantities.
 * I went ahead of the nominator and fixed those issues. In one place, there is a long line of "h" values, which I hesitate changing to hours, for brevity reasons. No uses because of enormous price and scarcity. Materialscientist (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: