Talk:Feudal society

Untitled
Why is this separate from Feudalism, which ought to discuss the society that evolved under feudal concepts, as part and parcel of an encyclopedic treatment of its subject? And should do a better job than is being done here, frankly. I'd suggest a merge, but there are only rememberings of potted school text here so far. "Feudal society" is a natural section heading at Feudalism.--Wetman 07:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, the Feudalism page is much better and this article doesn't cite any sources except for one 1930s book and even then it doesn't cite the source properly. I'm going to add a cite source tag and even a proposed merge/deletion. Master z0b 05:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Feudal Society is just another name for Manorialism, the two names are used interchangeably. Feudalism traditionally means only the political aspect and not the social, these are separate concepts. Trying to write about the two concepts in the same article is bad, and not needed since we already have an article on manorialism = feudal society. Green Cardamom (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)