Talk:Ficus aurea/GA1

Comments
Nice article. I'm not going to review it because of the obvious COI, but I've run the DOI bot and made some minor edits. Comments Good luck jimfbleak (talk) 05:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Fig size needs conversion to imperial
 * 2) Should Americana (the section) be italicised?
 * 3) Title of Linnaeus book - even after following the link I'm unsure of the correct capitalisation and whether it should be in italics.
 * 4) wasps emerge - from eggs or fig? I assume former, but best to clarify
 * 5) Refs 2,5,7, 11, and 22 at least need italics, usually for Ficus
 * 6) Flowering phenology in F. aurea Is this a table heading - if so format it as part of the table.


 * OK, I think italicised and capitalised seems the main way it's written, e.g.  Guettarda (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 30, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Pass. Some jargon did need explaining but this has now been done.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Pass, very well references
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images?: Pass

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Million_Moments (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)