Talk:Fiedler contingency model

Why does the article say "Fielder" instead of "Fiedler" throughout the text? Guess it's simply wrong, but can somebody confirm this?--131.234.232.100 (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

so why allow for contigency; design developemnt and risk where contingency is an undefined risk and design developemnt is a development contingency? Anon

I seem to remember that both Rice (1978) and Miner (1981) said that Fiedler's interpretations about what the LPC found were incorrect. Neither of them are mentioned in the article, and since I'm a newcomer I don't want to go meddling with the main page. (but thanks for the explanation anyway, I leant lots)