Talk:Fieldfare/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PumpkinSky (talk · contribs) 01:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * "Unusually for a thrush," sounds odd to me.  Pumpkin Sky   talk  02:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * Ref 10 needs a publisher parameter.  Pumpkin Sky   talk  01:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * "lores" needs linked to Lore (anatomy).
 * "There is a faint pale streak above the eye and the lores and under-eye" the two and's and two the's sounds awkward  Pumpkin Sky   talk  02:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Ref 2 is a dead link. Is about.com a reliable source? Refs 3 and 5 need page numbers.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Good quality and all free.  Pumpkin Sky   talk  01:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * English translation of Norwegian on commons would be nice.  Pumpkin Sky   talk  01:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you for taking on this review. I have dealt with the points you raise above and also polished up the lead section a bit. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I have removed/amended the references you mention above with the exception of the "Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names". I don't have a copy so do not have a page number. Now added, as Jimfbleak has kindly supplied page numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * English translation of Norwegian on commons would be nice.  Pumpkin Sky   talk  01:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you for taking on this review. I have dealt with the points you raise above and also polished up the lead section a bit. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I have removed/amended the references you mention above with the exception of the "Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names". I don't have a copy so do not have a page number. Now added, as Jimfbleak has kindly supplied page numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)