Talk:Fields of Sacrifice

MilHist B-class assessment
I've assessed the article for the Military History WikiProject B-class criteria. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It does have the beginnings of a defined structure, but lacks a lead section and one or more sections of content. It is free from major grammatical errors (can't find any, actually). It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. One of the major problems, though, is that part of the text reproduce the sources verbatim. This could be a problem if the sources are not public domain. If this point is addressed, the article could well be reassessed as B-class. Also suggest addition of more material on this film, if there is more on it out there (e.g. reviews and later reactions to the film). Carcharoth (talk) 12:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you for taking the time to look at this so thoroughly. I'm rewriting sections to remove any possible copyvio issues. I'll also look for more info and sourcing. Thank you, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Apologies for not replying sooner. Thanks for doing the rewriting. If you ever find more material and are able to expand it, that would meet the "structure" criterion, and it would then easily be B-class, in my opinion. Carcharoth (talk) 01:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fields of Sacrifice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926231304/http://www.filmreferencelibrary.ca/index.asp?layid=46&csid1=9&navid=46 to http://www.filmreferencelibrary.ca/index.asp?layid=46&csid1=9&navid=46

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)