Talk:Fifth Third Bank/Archives/2020

WP:NOTNEWS

 * It was brought to the public's attention by that the majority of the history section could be classified as WP:NOTNEWS. I would like to contest this on several points. 1. Original Reporting. None of the sources that were removed were original research. All sources were third party reliable news articles. 2. News article. I would say it is not a news article and is not routine news reporting as it reports major acquisitions that are of note. However, I do agree that it could be summarized. 3. Point number three does not apply in this context. 4. Not a diary. This is certainly not a diary as it only covers major events in its history. Overall, I think this edit was unjustified by the reason mentioned by the user and would ask that a consensus would be reached before big deletions of that kind again. Thank you.  Heart  Glow  (talk) 03:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)