Talk:Fight for This Love/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Checking to Wikipedia:Good article criteria

1 a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct;
 * The prose is okay but could be improved, some redundant wording: first entirely solo => first solo
 * The spelling is America English and British English, colour, favorable. Be consistence one way or the other. There are some mistakes, uncredited => unaccredited, lipsync => lip-sync, protege => protégé, certifed=> certified

1 (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
 * The lead does not comply with WP:LEAD, please ensure that the lead is a summary of the main body of the article. There are items in the lead not in the main text, i.e "Topmodel by Heidi Klum". References in the lead do not seem required in this lead and can therefore all be moved to the main body.
 * Disambiguous links. X Factor in the lead, Balmain in music video, DR. in ref 35, UOL in ref 82.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
 * There is bits unsourced, Last sentence in Background and composition. Most of the Music video section. Live performances, sentence in the middle starting "She wore black leggings".
 * Infobox: it appears Recorded,Genre,Length,Label,Writer(s),Producer are unsourced or conflicting with main body text.
 * Reference 1 thesun.co.uk is an unreliable source, as is twitter ref 8 & 15, if this has recently changed please point to the discussion. Reference 33 googlenews is dead. Ref 47 - msn is also dead.


 * Some bits missing. Germany Catalogue# for single. UK release date is incorrect, it was 18 October as one reference says, maybe split into two lines?

Striked, it wasn't UK only.

3. Broad in its coverage:
 * Generally good, there is not much coverage of the X-factor performance prior to the day of it's release, it maybe good to recheck that. The harem style trousers would be worth a comment as that was repeated in later live shows, also Simon Cowells comment after the performance. Consider a sentence explaining that promoting the single and her relationship with ashley cole was as the same time.

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
 * Seems good on that front. Remove only from 'In Belgium it only managed top-twenty'

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * Yes, stable. Low activity.

6. Illustrated, if possible, by images
 * A third image would be desirable, maybe from the live performance. The two existing images are not free.
 * Had a look on commons and Flickr but nothing suitable available.

Other comments. Hungarian Airplay Chart date, Succeeded by, this information is incomplete

Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That is it for today, will recheck after the dead/unreliable referenced have been updated. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments regarding new suggested changes.
 * Right at the moment i'm househunting so im quite busy as well as me having university exams so i won't be able to do these straight away. in fact not until Tuesday 8 June 2010 at the earliest though i will still be peaking on wikipedia every now and then to see if there's anything urgent. Feel free to keep me updated and A.S.A.P i will resolve (or attempt to) resolve the issues.
 * As for the catalogue numbers i sourced two from physical CDs that i have and the others from Iternational copies that friends have got. I recognise that in fact there could have been errors with that because the CD cases contain many different numbers. I cross referenced them with DISCOGs but someone on a different page said it wasn't that accurate. I will check a range of sources (Hung Median, HMV etc.) and find as many of the linkable catalogue numbers possible. Some of the international ones might be unsourceable in which case if there is a large number of questionable catalogue numbers i'll remove all from the release history and simply placed the sourced ones in the tracklisting where necessary.
 * I didn't realise how many errors existed. That's the problem when you nominate someone else's work for GA. This article didn't really have a main contributor and so the styling and referencing was all over the place. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, life comes first. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm on vacation now, if someone wishes to take this GA review on please do as I won't be available for several weeks. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 11:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I will gladly take over the article, please give me 30ish minutes to read the previous issues and i will start from there. (CK)Lakeshade ✽ talk2me 01:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

All issues stated about seem to be resolved. Now its my turn :) (CK)Lakeshade ✽ talk2me  02:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking this on User:L-l-CLK-l-l and well done to Lil-unique1 for getting this upto GA standard. A few minor things already mentioned:
 * Track listing for Ireland/UK is 3:46 for reference by Amazon but there are no track times on that Amazon reference.
 * The info box track length says 3:44 but it's 3:46.
 * Hungarian Airplay date is incomplete, it's not still number 1.
 * Catalogue numbers in release history are not available on references or in some cases a different ASIN is given. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)