Talk:Figure 8 (album)

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

 * All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Title?
i thought i heard in an interview with elliott that the reason for the title Figure 8 was this idea of a figure skater repeatedly marking out the same 8, making their own little self-contained shape more and more perfect. sounds like him to me. did he also name it after the song, or is that coincidence?

DonnyIDK 15:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Elliott smith figure 8 cover.jpg
Image:Elliott smith figure 8 cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Should Rolling Stone review rating be 3.5 or 5 stars?
The Rolling Stone review listed below the infobox was written by the well-known critic Jon Pareles at the time of the album's release. It was rated 3.5 stars. The review is referenced to Rolling Stone website here. An anonymous editor has been changing this rating to 5 stars, without explanation. The same thing happened about a year ago--different IP address, but I assume the same editor. I would like to end this slow-motion edit war. I encourage any comments on this issue by any editor. Thanks. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

is a new IP address, but I assume that it is the same person, as they are back, engaged in same activity described above. I encourage any comments on this issue by any editor. Thanks. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)