Talk:Filip Cabinet

Achievements section is not respecting NPOV
Several concerns with the Achievements section: --Pilaz (talk) 01:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The section in itself is uniquely biased towards giving positive information of what the Filip cabinet has done.
 * The title, in itself, is biased towards positive things that the Filip Government has done, since there is no shortcoming section. The name should be changed to Work or Policies.
 * Few English cabinet article feature the works of the government, i.e what the government has done. Italy, for example features the formation, fall, party breakdown, and composition of the government, but no mention of the policies. French cabinet pages seem to have a policies section, but subdivide by category - economy, healthcare, etc - and are fairly balanced.
 * No balance is given to the achievements of the government. No analysis of the policies is given here, except a minuscule sentence under the government reform subsection and the absence of remarks by the Ministry of Finance on the First House Program. WP:BALANCE is clearly not present here: these policies need to be judged with the diversity of opinions present. Simulatenously, however, WP:DUE must be met: the prominence of each opinion about the Filip Cabinet policies must be proportional to the amount of space that is dedicated here: a minority view should only get a brief mention, whereas a largely-held view should be reported first and with major details.