Talk:Filippo Drago (pharmacologist)

The article is neutral
The article reports objective information about the subject, all come from reliable sources, although there is a major contributor. There is no positive or either negative focus on the subject of the article.--95.250.103.1 (talk) 18:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC) The tag COI might be cancelled.
 * I agree with 95.250.103.1. Please remove COI.--Meatable (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with 95.250.103.1. I do not see any COI, therefore the warning Tag about COI should be removed. --Alberto castrogiovanni (talk) 08:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am improving the format and checking all statements and sources, then I will remove the COI warning (which has not been put there by me). -- Tanonero    (msg)  02:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

I am not sure if the most recent contributor is in a close connection to Drago (and I am not), but I don't see how the article does not represent a neutral standpoint given that all information is properly referenced and presented in a neutral tone. Would you mind pointing out what part(s) of the article are not neutral in your view? -- Tanonero    (msg)  11:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Chiarapchim surely is.
 * I removed some "Prof." but still it all sounds like a curriculum. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It does sound a bit like a CV, but the tone is unbiased and and the text is properly referenced. If anything, we are perhaps showing the wrong disclaimer. -- Tanonero    (msg)  21:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

I improved the article as much as I could and removed several sentences highlighting irrelevant career progression steps. I think it looks fine now. Please write here if you disagree, possibly pointing out the specific issues the article suffers from. -- Tanonero    (msg)  15:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)