Talk:Filter model

I simply don't see why my contribution is a candidate for speedy deletion.
 * Whilst you clearly understand the subject, the article is written in a "stream of thought", rather than as an encyclopedia article. There is no context to tell the reader what broad subject area we are in (is this a computing term??).
 * The article needs more links, it needs a short summary at the top, and to be broken into coherent sections that lead the reader through the subject.
 * Unfortunately, as it stands, the article would only make sense to somebody who already understands the subject.
 * Mayalld (talk) 11:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if we can point out what the article needs it isn't 'unsalvageable incoherent;-) --Tikiwont (talk) 12:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It has been merged into Donald Broadbent--Tikiwont (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)