Talk:FinMkt/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article is far away from meeting the GA criteria. After removed 'bad sources and puffery', the article is 190 words of text and tagged with refimprove and notability. It is far away from being a GA and I anticipate that it has little possibility of being improved to meet the criteria. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * yeah, the initial assessment seemed to assume press release churnalism and cryptocurrency blogs were RSes, and that's not the case - David Gerard (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Since this is a stub now, I'd say it's better off delisted for the time being. JAG  UAR   20:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This GA review has been open for around nine days and seems to have no chance of being improved to meet the GA criteria any time soon. I am therefore demoting this article to stub-class. It can be re-nominated if users feel they have addressed the problems brought up in this reassessment. Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 23:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)