Talk:Final Fantasy Tactics Advance/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

As part of the WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. And from the way it looks, it fails GA citeria. Problem are:
 * Un-referenced material.
 * An un-cited reference.
 * And, in my opinion, this and this seem unnesessary.
 * So if the article doesn't get fixed in 7 days, it will be delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Images removed, I agree with you that they're not being discussed in text but are instead just decoration. I'll see what I can do about the references/cites. -- Pres  N  15:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Uncited reference fixed. It was strange, someone just added a line break and a url to the end of another reference. -- Pres N  16:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * And now, references everywhere. Anything else to fix? -- Pres  N  03:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Where's the reviews for Edge and EGM? GamerPro64 (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoops, added. -- Pres N  20:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * O.k. I'm gonna keep its GA-status. Great job PresN! GamerPro64 (talk) 02:50, 10 October 2009 (UTC)