Talk:Final Fantasy Type-0 HD/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this. Basically I might change my style of reviews now, so I'll see how it goes with this one. JAG UAR   21:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "while the Steam port was released in August 2015" - link game port
 * "and performed on bass guitar and drums respectively" - comma needed
 * "The Blu-ray album reached #189 in the Oricon charts, and remained for one week" - link this to the Japanese charts
 * "The album, and music in general, have received positive comments from music critics and reviewers of the game" - if you plan on taking this to FA, I'd recommend fleshing out the critics' comments
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient detail for a recently discovered extra-solar object
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable, no edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article meets the criteria so I am happy to promote it. JAG  UAR   22:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)