Talk:Final approach (aeronautics)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Final approach (aeronautics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305155335/http://www.lcacc.org/operations/operations.html to http://www.lcacc.org/operations/operations.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Suggested Use of Sources
The current article's cites multiple sources, some of which are just plain wrong. Since the vast majority of all general aviation, commercial aviation, and airline transport operations occur either within or into and out of the United States of America, I strongly suggest this entry be rewritten by a CFI/I (Certified Flight Instructor - Instrument) using both FAA-H-8083-25A, "Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge" and FAA-H-8083-15B, "Instrument Flying Handbook," and FAA-H-8083-16A, "Instrument Procedures Handbook." All three are published by the Federal Aviation Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Therein you will find the correct terms. There's absolutely no need to reproduce the 840 pages contained in those documents. They will, however, ensure this article is accurate.Clepsydrae (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia and we work to present a world view on subjects and avoid a US-centric position. - Ahunt (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

First picture composite?
Is it possible to double check the source of the first picture? The distance between those four aircraft seems unsafely small, suggesting that it is a composite like the picture below it.

Starprizm (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


 * There is no indication of that, but perhaps it would be best to drop a not to the person who took the photo. He is a regular contributor of aviation photos here and I am sure he can explain the photo. - Ahunt (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 23 March 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

– Currently, Final approach is a dab page, while the aviation use has parenthetical disambiguation. However, with the exception of the aviation article, all the articles linked from the dab page are on subjects named "Final Approach", with a capital A - the aviation usage is the only one with a lower-case a. Per WP:DIFFCAPS, I believe that the capitalization is sufficient to disambiguate the aviation use, and therefore should be used per WP:CONCISE. This will involve moving the dab page - I suggest the capitalized form as the most appropriate target. Tevildo (talk) 16:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Final approach (aeronautics) → Final approach
 * Final approach → Final Approach
 * Support Per WP:DIFFCAPS as a clear application of the policy. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Always fun to see people citing links I made. Support per diffcaps Face-smile.svg Red   Slash  22:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)