Talk:Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones

Requested move 5 May 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 01:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones → Finally Enough Love – The 50 Number Ones subtitle is only applicable for the 50-track deluxe edition of the album.

– Theknine2 (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). - St3095  (?)  17:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand the standard edition is the 50 track version, as it celebrates Madonna's 50 number 1 club hits. The 16-track version is an abridged version to the standard edition. It does not seem to make sense to celebrate 50 hits with 16 tracks. Mannoragrace (talk) 18:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Of the sources cited for the article, only one calls the 50-track version a "deluxe" version, whereas the other sources (as well as Madonna's own website) do not call the 50-track version "deluxe" but do refer to the 16-track version as "abridged" or "condensed." I edited the article accordingly. Ww adh77 (talk) 22:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm concerned that both of your replies may not be considered oppose votes even though it appears you are both opposed. Would either of you care to make them official by voting oppose below?  Ss  112   03:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support Finally Enough Love is more concise and represents all editions. The fact that the 16-track version will also be released in various formats (vinyl, CD, streaming, digital), meaning that it's just as notable as the 50-track version. Bluesatellite (talk) 01:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. My reasoning in starting the article at this location is exactly what and  said above—the album exists to commemorate Madonna's 50 number ones on the US Dance chart. That meaning is lost when we get rid of the 50 Number Ones part of the title or treat it as a subtitle. The 16-track abridged edition seems to exist to placate those who want to buy the album but don't want to spend the money for the full (standard) 50-track edition. The 50 number ones edition should not be treated as a deluxe version of the "standard" 16-track edition. I also believe the argument (raised by Ww adh77) that the sources treat the 16-track edition as abridged and therefore not the full proper album is compelling.  Ss   112   03:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose Outside of the two sources that shorten the complete album title (probably for the sake of a more compact heading), I fail to find another source that talks about the album without mentioning the title in its entirety, be it retail websites or her official website. If the album is generally referred to as Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones I see no reason why the article on Wikipedia should leave that important specification out. As already pointed out, the addition 50 Number Ones specifically refers to the amount of number-one hits she's scored on the US Dance chart, which is basically the key indicator for naming the compilation the way they did. Lk95 (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose The album is called '50 Number Ones' to celebrate 50 nubmer one dance club hits by Madonna. The 16-track version is an "abridged version", as it is stated on Madonna's official wesbite. Also, I believe the abridged version will be released before the actual album as a sort of preview or teasrer for the official release of the complete album. So we'll have 2 realeases: the standard 50-track and the digital (abridged) 16-track. Mannoragrace (talk) 14:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Vinyl
Australia Vinyl Chart #2 666Sally666 (talk) 09:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "oricon": From Bedtime Stories (Madonna album):  From The Complete Studio Albums (1983–2008):  From Like a Virgin (album):  From Hung Up:  From List of Madonna records and achievements:  From Ray of Light: </li> <li>From The Immaculate Collection: </li> <li>From You Can Dance: </li> <li>From I'm Breathless: </li> <li>From Something to Remember: </li> <li>From True Blue (Madonna album): Note: Until January 1987, Japanese albums chart had been separated into LP, CD, and CT (audio cassette) charts. True Blue peaked at number 2 on the LP chart, number 1 on the CD chart, number 3 on the CT chart, respectively.</li> <li>From Like a Prayer (album): </li> <li>From Music (Madonna album): </li> <li>From American Life: </li> <li>From Remixed & Revisited: </li> <li>From Madonna (Madonna album): </li> <li>From Hard Candy (Madonna album): </li> <li>From Evita (soundtrack): </li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

H
Sweden Vinyl #7 Sweden Physical #2 666Sally666 (talk) 13:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

REFS

 * From Variety: “50 Number Ones” clocks in at 220 minutes
 * Billboard: Madonna on Jimmy Fallon "Ostensibly in the house to promote the upcoming 50-track version of her dance remix collection, Finally Enough Love: 50 Number One (Aug. 19)"

--Apoxyomenus (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The Farr Side: Madonna still Queen of Pop
 * Madonna And Nile Rodgers Throw Roller Disco Ahead Of ‘Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones’
 * Ireland: Madonna earns highest new entry on the Official Irish Albums Chart in the Week — Official Charts Company
 * Italy: Number one in Vinyls
 * Portugal: No1 in Official Charts +
 * Denmark: No2 but Vinyl albums charts only
 * Australia: ARIA early predicted #1
 * Netherlands: her eleventh number-one album + 1
 * No2 in Germany blocked by +1, +2
 * No2 in Italy blocked by +1
 * No2 in Spain blocked by
 * No2 in France blocked by
 * Madonna 50 YouTube questions
 * US Top Dance Electronic Albums Charts (Full article)

--Apoxyomenus (talk) 19:30, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Greek Albums
It peaked at #39 for two weeks. Vera (talk) 20:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Vera Re-inserted peak. I had the impression saw the peak at number 39, when was originally inserted by another user. But I couldn't find the appropriate archived version to prove that. Thanks, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Global sales figure so far please
Could you please add the global sales figure for finally enough love, many thanks 2A00:23C7:2C12:A001:D494:AA2C:7315:81E8 (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bpi":<ul> <li>From Madonna albums discography: </li> <li>From Kylie Minogue albums discography: </li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)