Talk:Financial asset

Proposed deletion template removed
I removed the proposed deletion template of 2015/mar/25 because I found the following objections to the reasons for deleting the article:

1) This article doesn't meet notability criteria

Quite to the contrary, the definition and explanation found in this article is very specific and it is not found anywhere in the "chain" of hyperlink nested articles: Economics → Financial economics → asset pricing redirected to Valuation (finance) → Asset.

2) This topic is documented elaborately at Economics

That section does not exist at the moment of this evaluation. A click on Economics leads to Economics.

3) The sources used here are not reliable and are one-sided

I do not know enough on Economics to discuss this, but this kind of opinions are usually highly subjective, even if right. It should be discussed further by other editors with proper knowledge of the topic.

Futhermore, besides the previous objections, I found the article quite specific, clear and informative for people like me, lacking specific knowledge. I believe that in any case, instead of being deleted, the article should be properly merged as a section within Asset, and linked to or redirected in other articles accordingly.

For the said reasons, I remove the proposed deletion template. As the template itself indicates:

"You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it."

Pmronchi (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)