Talk:Finbar Prunty

Why do other Monaghan United players have articles? Delete this, and you'll have to delete around 50,000 articles on minor footballers and clubs across the world. Have a little intelligence and make the right decision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iloveamerica2much (talk • contribs) 22:17, 25 January 2008
 * There is no need to be cross. I noticed you're a relatively new user.  I would hope that you would enjoy working here at wikipedia, but please understand that this is not a place where you can make comments such as the one you just made.   Keeper   |   76  21:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, I forgot that invoking someone to use intelligence and make a good decision is a big no no in the great meritocratic mobocracy that is wikipedia. Iloveamerica2much (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Keeper! Maybe I can keep my cynicism in check?? Iloveamerica2much (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The decision was based on CSD A1, which reads: Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. The article is currently only a single sentence whose information could be deduced by reading the team list at Monaghan United F.C., and no reliable secondary sources are cited (and, indeed, I am finding it hard to locate any). The article needs expansion and citations – perhaps you could take care of this? haz (talk) 21:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sufficient context exists for a stub. Dloh  cierekim  22:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

It's been deleted twice before. "Footballer X plays for footballer Y" is not sufficient content. Given that the only incoming link is from the football club's article the reader clicking through already knows that.

As a recreation of deleted material I could have just deleted it again, but I've replaced with a redirect so that the article can be restored if material is added to make it a worthwhile enyclopedia article (which also proves notability). --kingboyk (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)