Talk:Fiona Dolman

Deletion
Have asked User:Police,Mad,Jack to explain reasoning behind his G6 deletion request. nancy (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've taken the liberty of removing the tag. I can't see that the criterion applies here, not even after reading the editor's response on your discussion page. Salvador Barley (talk) 10:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Its a not very good article, it is poorly written. I question notability and references (by and large) have taken a holiday it appears. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 12:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * And how does that fall under "Non-controversial maintenance, such as temporarily deleting a page to merge page histories, or performing uncontroversial page moves"? It seems to me that questionable notability isn't covered by the criterion you cited.  --Salvador Barley (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh my goodness, I didnt properly cover it in my criterion. Prison for me eh? Keep your page, despite it being all the things I have stated. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 12:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh and please try to WP:Assume Good Faith your tone really is quite horrible. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 12:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It wasn't your faith I was questioning. --Salvador Barley (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Your right, I was questioning yours. Drop the childish acts, dear me. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 14:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I can see there's little point in continuing this discussion. Good day. Salvador Barley (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

You think? Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 14:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)