Talk:Fiona Scott Lazareff/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sdkb (talk · contribs) 05:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 18, 2021, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: ❌ I spot significant issues, such as the lead sentence structure, missing essential commas (e.g. after "international strategy" and "Nicolas"), and grammar errors like The first groups of awards was in 2014
 * 2. Verifiable?:
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: ❌ The article is completely missing any coverage of her early life, among other issues.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?:
 * 5. Stable?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass
 * 6. Images?: ❌ This is very close to a pass, but the image caption does not provide the year, which I would say would be necessary to meet the "suitable captions" criteria.

This article was nominated by a London-based IP who also nominated Fernando Sulichin (which was reverted before the bot picked it up) and is now part of a blocked range. This is clearly a long way from meeting GA standards for prose quality and breadth of coverage, so I'm quick-failing it to get it off the queue.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 05:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)