Talk:Fire Station No. 4 (Pawtucket, Rhode Island)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

: With a few grammatical tweaks, the article now complies with policies on layout, grammar and structure. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article cites several reliable publications in its bibliography, and makes appropriately frequent use of them. There does not appear to be any original research. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article appears to cover all relevant aspects of its topic for which encyclopedic information was readily available. Nothing trivial seems to have been incorporated. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. There are no signs of bias exhibited anywhere in the article. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC) . Immediate view of the revision history shows that the article has not been subjected to edit warring in all its existence. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC) : Both images used in the article serve a relevant and informative purpose in illustration. Both are validly licensed, and are accepted on the Wikimedia Commons, so fair use is not a problem. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reading through this article and making a few minor grammatical adjustments, I believe it satisfies the GA criteria. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)