Talk:Fire challenge

Deletion
Is this really the sort of activity that should be included in an encyclopaedia? Surely giving it some 'authority' or 'endorsement' could lead the vulnerable/incredibly stupid to engage in this activity as if it's normal, sensible behaviour. This page should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.217.246.178 (talk • contribs)
 * I created this page because I felt that 'Fire Challenge' met the WP:GNG due to its prevalence in RS. This makes me somewhat biased towards keeping; after all, I made the page. But if you want to nominate it for deletion, see WP:AFD. Tutelary (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing will keep terminally stupid people from self-selecting themselves out of the gene pool. 47.137.182.8 (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fire challenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811021114/http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3522331.shtml to http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3522331.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

"Supposedly" harmful nature?
Shouldn't that phrase read obviously harmful nature? What is supposed about the harm that will come from intentionally setting oneself on fire? 47.137.182.8 (talk) 01:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)