Talk:Firefly Studios

Untitled
So... Dunegon Hero and Stronghold 3 both have articles despite the fact that nobody outside firefly has ever played them... Yet Stronghold Kingdoms, a released game with thousands of active players, is deemed unworthy..... Hmm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.206.67.34 (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

→Kingdoms is just too similar to Clash of Clans. Don't expect other people to treat it as nothing more than a knock-off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.9.103.15 (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

A knock off that came out 2 years before it? That's quite impressive. I take it you haven't played Kingdoms though, since it's a very different style of game. Otherwise Firefly should be concerned that Supercell copied them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.113.119.156 (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Firefly Studios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67OgWBmT8?url=http://www.southpeakgames.com/news/southpeak-games-acquires-rights-publish-firefly-studios-stronghold-3 to http://www.southpeakgames.com/news/801/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Copy edit listing July 2021
I have made a number of copy-edits to this article as it was listed on the community portal. I did retain all of the original content, but also added some more info about the successes of the studio, as I felt there was a lot of focus on negative reviews for the Stronghold series. I felt that this offered a bit more balance to the article overall. I think the 'copy-edit' needed tag could now be deleted but would welcome a second opinion from other Wikipedia editors. Thanks Mattbenjamin2021 15:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I have done some additional copyediting (hopefully without steamrolling yours) and removed some of the unnecessary negative words. I think with a bit more work the tag can be removed, but maybe I'm being a stickler. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I've given it a look and did some more edits, and it looks like the copyediting work is complete now. I've removed the tag. --Slon02 (talk) 17:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)