Talk:First Battle of Newbury/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Day, Jon (2007). Gloucester & Newbury 1643: The Turning Point of the Civil War the ISBN is incorrect
 * 1) Worden, Blair (2009). The English Civil Wars, 1640-1660. Phoenix Sme with this one the ISBN needs checking
 * 2) Not a requirement for GA if if going any further the cities of publication needs adding to the books.
 * 3) Some links need disambiguating River Avon, Severn Valley, Upton

A good read just some minor points that keep if from GA well done. Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Passed GA