Talk:First Mongol invasion of Burma/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zanhe (talk · contribs) 05:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

I promised to review the GA nomination a while ago. Sorry it took me so long. I'll review this in the next few days. -Zanhe (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * The prose is clear and concise. Only needed very minor copyediting. AGF on copyvio, as almost all sources are offline. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Lead, layout, formatting are in compliance. Not related to fiction or lists. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Yes. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
 * Reliable sources cited throughout. I'm reasonably familiar with the subject. Although most sources are offline, the article is factually accurate as far as I can tell. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * All conclusions or opinions are supported with reliable neutral sources. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Covers the entire war from beginning to end, as well as background, aftermath, and legacy. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * Long enough to cover all major aspects but remain focused. No excessive details. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutrally written in dispassionate tone. Sources are academic, not biased toward any party to the war. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * No edit wars. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
 * All images are on Commons, either Public Domain or tagged with a free license. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Good use of images and maps, including several created by the main author . All have appropriate captions. -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: This is a very well written article on an important historical event that has had major implications on the history and demographics of Southeast Asia. Kudos to  for greatly expanding the article and bringing it to GA standard. Thank you for your hard work! -Zanhe (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)