Talk:First Persian invasion of Greece/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I have to say I'm very impressed with the amount of great work that you've put into this article. Having written several articles on this topic, I am very pleased to see that someone has taken the time and effort to piece this great chapter in history into an article.

Well-written I believe that the article is very well written and is enjoyable to read. The prose is clear and the grammar is correct and the article complies with WP:MoS|MoS]]. Though I would recommend in the section 490 BC: Datis and Artaphernes' Campaign, that you merge some of the smaller subsection together. For example, you could merge Siege of Eretria and Karytos into a section called Euboea and Lindos, Naxos and the Cyclades into a section. Factually accurate and verifiable I can find no fault with the sources and references of this article as it has a good mixture of secondary and primary source and is well cited throughout. Broad in its coverage The article is broad in coverage and covers the topic very well. Neutral The article is neutral and has no bias.

Stable The article is stable and there is no history of edit warring.

Illustrated, if possible, by images The article has a good amount of images including maps.

I am happy to say that this article has reached a standard where it can be called a good article. Congratulations on bring this article to a Good Article standard. Kyriakos (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)