Talk:First Presbyterian Church of Marcellus/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''
 * Result: Delisted, per personal assessment; nominator abandoned review.. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

This GAR is, best I can explain, half bureaucracy half with actual concerns. The original GA was reviewed by Kathryncelestewright, a sock of the banned Itslassietime. At that time, the reviewer "copyedited" the article, which actually was just a significant copyvio from the rootsweb source. This makes the GA invalid as far as I'm concerned, and I have since reverted to the pre-GA version to clean the article of copyright as the original was fine. However, as I actually read over the article I have other concerns with it even after fixing the copyright issue. The rootsweb source is by far the dominant one used but I'm not certain of it's reliability. It supposedly came from a book, and while I was able to verify the book actually exists, I have no idea of its publication status (it has no ISBN). Ironically the only non-church/non-obit sources were a couple that were added by the sock as part of the copyvio and I was unable to verify them at all. The article certainly isn't bad but it definitely needs work to get it to current GA levels. I'll put on hold for a week pending a response. Wizardman 15:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, do you wish to delist this article? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)