Talk:First Strike (Stargate Atlantis)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of July 20, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: I would suggest at least one other editor previously uninvolved with the article (and preferably previously uninvolved with Stargate mythos) look over the article and do some minor copyediting/proofreading for readability to those not familiar with Stargate and the episode.
 * Hopefully have that sorted out tomorrow. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 00:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Good. I like the subsection breakdown in the Production subsection. However, I would recommend expanding the Reception subsection with a bit more from print media sources, if reviews in such exist.
 * Unfortunately, I can't find much on print media sources, as I don't currently own any which involves First Strike, but I have found another internet source or two to expand on the reception section, but doubtful it could be expended more. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 00:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Neutrally presented with matter of fact wording throughout, no issues here.
 * 5. Article stability? No issues upon inspection of article and talk page edit history.
 * 6. Images?:


 * File:First Strike SGA S3E20.jpg = fair use, image page is good.
 * File:Stargate Atlantis script.jpg = free use, image located at Wikimedia Commons, checks out okay.
 * File:Jewel Statie @ the Serenity Flanvention.jpg = free use, image located at Wikimedia Commons, checks out okay.
 * File:Joeflanigan.jpg = free use, image located at Wikimedia Commons, checks out okay - but could use standardization with commons:Template:Information.
 * Done, I hope. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 00:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 02:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Any updates on points 1 and 3, from above? Cirt (talk) 16:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Query
 * I updated 3 a little, but I cannot find anything else on the matter. On 1 however, I'm afraid only I could copy-edit it; Stargate is generally an ignored franchise for its longevity. Long story short, matters 1 and 3 are (hopefully) addressed. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Are the concerns adressed Cirt? Wizardman  14:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am going to see if I can do some research for additional coverage regarding Reception, in secondary sources. Cirt (talk) 01:34, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Passed
Passed as GA. Cirt (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)