Talk:Fisherface

Untitled
The article seems to be synopsis of a relatively small part of the cited source, although "synoposis" may be too generous - entire sentences have been used as is.

The source may be found here, and is certainly copyrighted.

The larger subject is digital (computerized) facial encoding and recognition. John Broughton 20:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

So, is this program note worthy enough to have an entire article to itself? Or do we delete it and just stick with an article on computerised facial encoding and recognition? --Stretch 12:50, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't think it's worth an article of its own - I doubt very much that the subject is mentioned (other than in a list) in anything but very specialized journals, and that isn't wikipedia's target audience. John Broughton 16:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Now that the article has been taken down for copyvio, do we just nominate it for deletion completely? --Stretch 00:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Would you mind doing that? It's a good idea. John Broughton 00:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Done. --Stretch 06:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Reversal of Deletion and Redirection decision.
I do think that Fischerfaces ought to have its own article as it not specialized enough. The method of Eigenfaces, for example, has its own article. Meowist (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)