Talk:Fishing cat/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator:

Reviewer: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

, in the less than 14 hours since the review was last quickfailed, the article has not had substantive change per the feedback of. The only addition was a section on infections. The article still has the same major gaps in content, in particular: interactions with humans, hunting patterns, feeding, parental care, and information from the IUCN. Furthermore, a lot of the language is highly technical and difficult to read. As just one example, "There is evidence that the nominate taxon and the Javan fishing cat are distinguishable by skull morphometrics" is unbroachable to anyone who is not an expert in taxonomy. Please take time to address these concerns before nominating the article again, and please refrain from re-nominating any article so quickly without making substantive improvements after a quickfail. Fritzmann (message me) 15:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Stop assuming and look at the article history. Wolverine XI   ( talk to me ) 15:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This is the comparison I viewed. Aside from the infections section, one sentence on hunting has been added and three sentences on human interactions have been added. These do not adequately fill the content gaps identified in the last two reviews. I was not assuming, and I did look at the article history. Please do not remove GA reviews from the article's talk page. Fritzmann (message me) 17:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)