Talk:Fiske & Meginnis

Table
The whole historic column needs to go. Who decides which are historic or not? Some indication of whether.the building are NRHP listed would be helpful. I also think chonological would be a lot better than alphabetical. Especially since various architects and partnserships are involved. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:27, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

how organize related firms and individual architect articles? merger?
It is a bit confusing now.
 * Fiske & Meginnis is this article (to which Fiske and Meginnis properly redirects).
 * Ferdinand C. Fiske redirects to this article, and the name is bolded here. More bio information about him, perhaps a separate section, can be added.
 * Harry Meginnis redirects Meginnis and Schaumberg, instead, although the name is bolded here. Should not be bolded, should be wikilinked if his bio info is going to be elsewhere. Perhaps he should be covered here, though.
 * Fiske and Dieman is a redlink currently. Perhaps should be redirected/merged to here?
 * If so, then bio info about Dieman could be added
 * Fiske, Meginnis and Schaumberg is a redlink currently. Perhaps should be redirected/merged to here?
 * If so, bio info about Schamberg could be added
 * Meginnis and Schaumberg is a separate article currently. Unclear which of the works there are attributed exactly to Meginnis and Schaumberg, or whether they might be attributed to just one of the architects or to some other combination.

Is anyone watching here, who could comment please? --Doncram (talk) 01:40, 20 May 2019 (UTC)