Talk:Fissipedia

Is the perspective off here?
The opening four words, and the classification list, clearly indicate the defunct nature of the group, but the wording elsewhere seems to indicate otherwise. I think it's the use of "are" for something that no longer exists. I'm not sure how former classifications should be treated when it comes to this, but this doesn't seem correct. Lusotitan (talk) 01:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)