Talk:Five Minutes with Arctic Monkeys

Fair use rationale for Image:Five minutes with the Arctic Monkeys.jpg
Image:Five minutes with the Arctic Monkeys.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

EP/single
Since when was a 2 track record lasting 6 minutes an "extended play"? And what difference does it make if the band called it an EP? It's a single. If they'd released a one track 7-inch with only the A-side on it and called it Five Minutes With Arctic Monkeys, by the 'EP' logic, this would then be a one-track EP, which is nonsense.--Michig (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Now we have it categorized as an album - utterly ridiculous. --Michig (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)